RESEARCH REPORTS                                                             TGC REPORT 52, 2002 ______________________________________________________________________                             potato leaf margin sometimes has a few rather wide and deep serrations (Fig 1e), but it can  be  accurately  identified  with  practice.  The  new  phenotype  was  a  monogenic recessive to wild type based on the F1 and F2 results (Table 1). The new phenotype was a monogenic dominant to c. The data suggest the new phenotype is allelic to c although there were 2 plants that appeared to be wild type in the 745-Y1 x LA 2510 F2. These may have been misclassified (although they were grown out and checked later) or due to some type of error in the experiment. A closely linked gene to c can not be ruled out, but it is felt that another allele at the c locus provides the best fit to the data. The symbol c2 is thus proposed for the potato leaf allele derived from LA 1932.   It  is  surprising  that  this  allele  emerged  from  a  cross  of  two  non-potato  leaf  parents. Possibly  LA  1932  (sp+)  is  heterozygous  for  c2,  although  I  do  not  remember  seeing indeterminate  potato  leaf plants  in  any  of  our  work.  Apparently  LA  1932  has  a  gene linked  on  the  opposite  side  of  the  sp  locus  (or  very  close  to  it)  that  is  epistatic  to  c2 expression. The tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) resistant variety ‘Tyking’ also has a potato leaf type. Furthermore, we tested Henri Laterrot’s CHILTYLIC94-3 population in  1995  and  found  a  few  plants  showed  ToMoV  resistance.  A  few  generations  of resistance  selection  followed  and  derived  homozygous  resistant  lines  all  had  potato leaves.  Since  ‘Tyking’  is  in  the  pedigree  of  the  CHILTYLC94-3  population,  this  could have been the source of the potato leaf. No allelism work has been done with  c2 and these other genotypes or with cint which has some similarity to c2 but a different length /width  ratio  (see  images  in  the  TGRC  website).  It  does  seem  probable  that  these genotypes have a geminivirus resistance gene in the c region of chromosome 6. Lines derived from LA 1932 with ToMoV and TYLCV resistance without c2 have recently been developed, indicating the linkage between c2 and the resistance gene has been broken. Literature Cited Griffiths, P.D. 1998. Inheritance and linkage of geminivirus resistance genes derived from Lycopersicon chilense Dunal in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). PhD diss., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville. Griffiths, P.D. and J.W. Scott. 2001. Inheritance and linkage of tomato mottle virus resistance genes derived from Lycopersicon chilense accession LA 1932. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126(4):462-467. Scott, J.W. and D.J. Schuster. 1991. Screening of accessions for resistance to the Florida tomato geminivirus. TGC Rpt. 41:48-50. Tanksley, S. et al. 1992. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:1141-1160. Weide, R. et al. 1993. Integration of the classical and molecular linkage maps of tomato chromosome 6. Genetics 135:1175-1186. 32

No navigation control above? Click here!