RESEARCH REPORTS                                                             TGC REPORT 52, 2002 ______________________________________________________________________                             A new allele at the potato leaf locus derived from L. chilense accession LA 1932 is discovered in a geminivirus resistance project. Scott, J.W. University  of  Florida,  IFAS,  Gulf  Coast  Research  &  Education  Center,  Bradenton,  FL 34203 The potato leaf (c) locus has been mapped to chromosome 6 near the  sp and  B  loci Tanksley  et  al.,  1992;  Weide  et  al.,  1993).  In  1990  we  discovered  resistance  to  the geminivirus,  tomato  mottle  virus  (ToMoV),  in  several  accessions  of  L.  chilense  (Scott and Schuster, 1991). Resistance was introgressed into tomato by crossing entirely with cut  leaf  recurrent  parents.  Nevertheless,  we  began  to  find  potato  leaf  segregants  in determinate plants derived from LA 1932 (and LA1961). The potato leaf trait seemed to be associated with ToMoV resistance and potato leaf was used along with sp to anchor RAPD  markers  linked  to  resistance  loci  (Griffiths,  1998;  Griffiths  and  Scott,  2001).  In that  research  it  was  observed  that  the  potato  leaf  type  observed  was  not  as  easily identified as with c genotypes. To  determine  if  the  LA  1932 derived  potato  leaf  was  in  fact an   allele   at   the   c   locus,   an inbred   with   the   trait,   745-Y1, was crossed with c     leaf accessions   LA   2510   and   LA 2513     and     Fla.     7781     (c+). Subsequently,    F2    seed    was obtained for each cross. Parents,  F1  and  F2  generations were grown in Todd planter flats in    a    greenhouse    in    spring, 2002. Plants were rated as wild type (cut leaf), potato leaf (c), or LA   1932   potato   leaf   (Fig.   1) when seedlings were at the 2-3 leaf stage. The LA 1932 derived potato  leaf  is  not  as  distinctive as  c,  the  leaf  generally  has  a lower  length  to  width  ratio,  is more rounded than pointed, and has a small serration in the leaf margin (Fig. 1). As can be seen in  Fig.  1d,  the  axillary  leaflets often   connect   to   the   terminal leaflet  unlike  c  where  they  are generally separate. The LA 1932 31

No navigation control above? Click here!