Analysis of organ-specific DNA methylation of several loci in tomato

White, O.R. and O'Connell, M.A.

DNA samples from different Lycopersicon esculentum (cultivar UC82) were isolated and used to detect the presence of 5- methylcytosine (5mC) residues in and around a variety of gene locations. We have detected novel methylation states of particular loci by hybridizing specific cDNA probes (Bernatzky and Tanksley 1986) in Southern analyses to DNA treated with the restriction enzyme HpaII. This enzyme is unable to cleave if either of the cytosines in its recognition sequence (CCGG) are methylated. Of six loci screened, four were differentially methylated in DNA isolated from different plant organs (Table 1). From these experiments we observed that not only does DNA methylation differ between plant organs, but differential DNA methylation is observed within the same organ. Altogether, 12 loci were examined using Southern analyses, and all of the loci were located on HpaII/MspI DNA fragments much larger than would be predicted for enzymes which recognize a four base sequence (Table 2). These results indicate that the tomato genome is methylated, methylated sequences are distributed throughout the genome and include regions adjacent to or encompassing coding sequences, and finally that the methylation status of genes may differ as a function of development.

Table 1. Distribution of signal in variable Hpa II fragments in DNA isolated from tomato organs. The DNA fragments observed on autoradiographs developed following hybridization of Southern blots with the indicated cDNA probes were quantified using a scanning laser densitometer. The total signal in each lane was set to 100% and the distribution of the signal among multiple fragments in each lane is indicated.

________________________________________________________
                                % signal  
                        ________________________________
locus       fragmen     leaf    root    seed    seedling 
            size (kb) 
________________________________________________________
CD25A       5.9          89     100      86        94
            4.0          11       -      14         6

CD8         3.2          93     100     100       100
            2.3          7        -       -         -

CD28        7.5          22       -      16        29
            7.0          58      93      77        64
            5.8          20       7       7         7

CD13A       1.9          58      65      85        81
            1.0          27       -      15        17
            0.7          15      35       -         2

CD3        15.0         100     100     100       100
CD39        4.5         100     100     100       100
________________________________________________________
Table 2. Sizes of HpaII and MspI fragments encompassing cDNA loci in tomato leaf DNA. The number in parentheses following the cDNA locus, indicates the chromosomal location of the locus, ND indicates the digestion was not performed.

______________________________________________________________
           Fragment Sizes (kb)             Fragment Sizes (kb)
           ___________________             ___________________
Locus       HpaI       MspI       Locus     HpaI       MspI
______________________________________________________________
CD12 (1)     10.5      2.5        CD25A (6   5.9         5.0
                                             4.0         3.0
CD28 (1)     7.5       6.8
             7.0       1.1        CD14 (6)  10.0         1.0
             5.8                             7.2
                                             5.5
CD35 (2)   >20.0       4.8
             4.4                  CD40 (8)   3.8         3.8
             3.2                             3.2         3.2
             0.65
                                  CD7 (8)    5.8
CD13A (3)    1.9                             3.1          ND
             1.0        ND                   2.9
             0.7
                                  CD8 (9)    3.2          ND
CD3 (3)     15.0        ND                   2.3

CD39 (4)     4.5        ND        CD2 (12)   9.0         2.5
________________________________________________________________
Literature cited:

Bernatzky, R.B. and S.D. Tanksley. 1986 Genetics 112:887-898