Hybridization between the tomato cultivars and wild species Lycopersicon peruvianum by means of ovule culture

Imanishi, S. and Chen, L.

Cultivars (Early PInk, Kyoryoku Toko, Sekaiichi and Giban No. 1) as female parents were diallel-crossed with Lycopersicon peruvianum (PI128652 and P1270435) and L. per. var. glandulosum (PI128644) as male parents. Immature ovules taken from colored fruits were washed through tap water and then treated with a 2% sterile antiformin for about 7 minutes and again washed in sterilized water. Out of them, the ovules, which appeared to be capable of germination according to the characteristics described by Imanishi (1988), were selected in order and plated onto MS agar medium without plant hormones. The efficiency of the visual selection of ovules was highly remarkable in the crosses of Early Pink or Kyoryoku Toko x wild species (Table 1). In the case of Sekaiichi and Giban No. 1, the ovules which appeared to be capable of germination were very few. Early Pink as a female parent was the highest in crosscompatibility with wild species followed by Kyoryoku Toko. Giban No. 1 yielded no ovules that germinated. PI128644 was higher than PI128652 and PI270435 in the cross-compatibility with Early Pink and Kyoryoku Toko. PI270435 seems to have the lowest cross-compatibility with cultivars (Table 2).

Hybrid plants were determined by the ability of shoot-formation. Leaf segments of young leaves of the hybrid plants maintained in vitro were cultured on MA agar medium supplemented with 1.0 mg/1 BA and shoots induced were counted 20 days after initial culture. Forty-three hybrid plants tested were found to be true hybrid ones. Embryos were dissected from the ovules, which appeared to be capable of germination, of the cross of Early Pink and PI128644 and classified into four groups (Table 3). Most of the embryos belonged to Groups C and D.

Literature cited:

Imanishi, S. 1988. Efficient ovule culture for the hybridization of Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum, L. glandulosum. Jap. J. Breed. 38:1-9.

Table 1: Visual selection and germination of immature F1 ovules

_______________________________________________________________
                      Visual selection and germination
Cross     No. of ovules _________________________  Total ovules
             in fruits  No. of ovules  No of ovules  germinated
                          incubated   that germinated         
_______________________________________________________________
EP1 x PI 128644  3489         59            38              43
EP x PI 128652   4304         60            25              28
EP x PI 270435   6935        101            27              27
KT2 x PI 128652  6422        100             8              12
KT x PI 128652   4422         80             4               4
KT x PI 270435   4306         90             0               0
_______________________________________________________________
1:  Early Pink      2:  Kyoryoku Toko
Table 2:The number of F1 ovules per fruit which germinated

____________________________________________________________
                                L. peruvianum (male)
                 ___________________________________________
Cultivar (female) PI 128644   PI 128652  PI 270435   Average
____________________________________________________________
EP                2.26 (19)   1.12 (25)  1.04 (26)    1.47
KT                0.31 (39)   0.13 (31)  0.0 (26)     0.15
SI1               0.04 (26)   0.10 (30)  0.07 (41)    0.07
GB2               0.0 (22)    0.0 (12)   0.0 (12)     0.0
____________________________________________________________
Average   0.65            0.34        0.28
____________________________________________________________
Numerals in parentheses are the number of fruit
1:  Sekaiichi,  2:  Giban No. 1
Table 3: Classification of embryos in the F1 ovules that appear to be capable of germination.

______________________________________________________________
Type No. of embryos       Description
______________________________________________________________
A     1 (4.3)     Incomplete cotyledons were formed
B     5 (21.7)    Cotyledonary primordia were recognized
C     9 (39.2)    Rod-shaped embryos with  twist in the middle
D     8 (34.8)    Rod-shaped embryos
______________________________________________________________
Numerals in parentheses show percentage.