nontransformed plants. The amount of IAA released after mild alkali hydrolysis was 4.4 times greater in T1 transgenic  than in nontransformed seedlings. However,  the amount of IAA released after strong hydrolysis was about the same in both types of seedlings. Neverthless the total IAA content was 1.4 times higher in transgenic T1 seedlings compared to nontransformed T1 seedlings. Table  4.  The  contents  of  free  and  bound  IAA  in  nontransformed  and  transgenic  seedlings  T1  of tomato cv. Ventura (ng per g fr wt) Variant Free IAA After hydrolysis in 1 N NaOH After hydrolysis In 7N NaOH Total content of IAA Nontransformed 15.74±1.89 14.99±1.10 138.28±2.17   168.98±4.51 Transgenic plant   31.40±7.06 65.08±6.15 147.01±17.54 243.49±10.25 A morphometric analysis of adult plants grown in the greenhouse is presented in Table 5. Both types of plants were grown in conditions adjusted to agricultural production with four plants per square meter of earth. Transgenic T1 tomatoes were larger and taller with many stems covered with broader leaves of about 3 times size of nontransgenic ones. The yield per square meter was 33% higher from transgenic T1 plants compared to nontransformed plants under conditions close to industrial agriculture. Table 5. A morphometric analysis of nontransformed and transgenic tomatoes T1 cv. Ventura Variant Mass of plant (kg) Stem number Stem length, (cm) Mass of one leaf (g) Mean leaf area (cm2) Yield   (kg/m2) Nontransformed    1,38±0,76      5,50±1,50    77,25±10,13      8,71±3,69 240,79±97,37      8,89 Transgenic 2,91±0,98 11,33±0,47 125,00±5,35 29,27±7,80 772,37±89,37 11,86 It was observed during the growth in the greenhouse that transgenic T1 plants were more resistant to high temperature and drought. For example, the amount of nonpollinated sterile ovaries was about 30 per transgenic plant and about 80 per nontransformed plant. The nonpollinated ovaries formed undeveloped small fruits that then died. The size of the leaves was about 3 times more on transgenic plants compared to nontransformed plants. It was decided to make a model experiment in vitro in order to check the osmotic resistance of both types of tomatoes. Tomato seeds were germinated on agar medium with mineral salts according to Murashige and Skoog (MS) (1962). After two weeks of growth, cuttings without roots were placed on the same MS medium containing 0.05 M, or 0.1 M or 0.25 M mannitol, as well 0.6 M indolebutyric acid and 8 mg/l thiamine as hormonal and nutritional additives. After 1 month of maintaining of cuttings on this medium, the root number and total root length were estimated (Table 6). Without mannitol the root formation of transgenic cuttings was 2.7 times more active according to root number and 1.9 times larger in total root length compared to nontransformed roots . At 0.05 M and 0.1 M mannitol, root formation was more effective in the case of transgenic tomato. At the highest concentration (0.25 M mannitol) the formation of many thick and short roots was observed in the case of transgenic T1 plants. There was no root formation in nontransgenic cuttings at 0.25 M mannitol in medium.

No navigation control above? Click here!