Table 2. The effect of 200 g/l of kanamycin on the growth of T1 tomato seedlings cv. Ventura in soil Variants before treatment with kanamycin Height (cm) Mean leaf area (cm2) Nontransformed 4.27±1.76 2.01±0.11 Transgenic 6.50±1.13 5.97±0.29 Variants after one week of kanamycin treatment Nontransformed 5.51±1.51 3.21±1.89 Transgenic 8.48±1.71 7.84±2.33 The transgenic nature of T1 tomato plants was confirmed by the expression of the marker gene gus that encodes the enzyme ƒÀ -glucuronidase (GUS). GUS was foundonly in leaves of transgenic plants especially in the fractions enriched with chloroplasts: Supernatant from transgenic tomato  plants             - 1.31 imp .s -1 . mg-equivalent -1 of GUS ; Chloroplasts fraction from transgenic plant         – 198.18  imp .s -1 . mg-equivalent -1 of GUS ; Supernatant from nontransformed plants                   – 0.0 imp .s -1 . mg-equivalent -1 of GUS ; Chloroplast faction from nontransformed plants        -  0.0  imp .s -1 . mg-equivalent -1 of GUS . According to the data obtained for expression of marker enzymes, it was concluded that integration of the genes was inherited in T1 generation of tomato seedlings var. Ventura after infection of T0 tomato seedlings with the transconjugant of triparental mating. In order to prove the expression of target gene ugt, the activity of UDPG-transferase was tested both in nontransformed and transgenic plants of T1 generation. As was shown in Table 3, the conversion activity of IAA to IAA-glucose was about 4 times more active in cytosol of transgenic plants and 2 times more active in chloroplasts fractions of transgenic plants compared to nontransformed plants. Table 3.  Activity of UDPG-transferase in nontransformed and transgenic T1 plants of tomato cv. Ventura Variant UDPG-transferase, nmol of IAA- glucose/mg of protein/h Nontransformed    cytosol            32.07±15.14    chloroplasts            66.95±25.50 Transgenic   cytosol          132.50±50.48   chloroplasts          114.70±9.10 The PCR analyses had shown the integrity of the genes ugt and acb in genomic DNA of transgenic tomato (Figure 1, A, B, C and E). The Southern blot revealed more homology to the probe (made from PCR product with primers to the gene ugt from cloned pBluescript) in DNA from roots of transgenic tomato (Figure 1, D). Higher activity of UDPG-transferase in transgenic plants was perhaps the reason for the increased level of free IAA and alkali labile bound IAA. The free content of IAA was about two times higher in transgenic plants  compared to

No navigation control above? Click here!