Use of SNP markers to genotype commercial hybrids and Spanish local cultivers of tomato García-Gusano, M.; García-Martínez, S.; and Ruiz, J.J. Escuela Politécnica Superior de Orihuela. Universidad Miguel Hernández Carretera de Beniel, km 3,2. -03312- Orihuela (Alicante) The  low  diversity  of  tomato  cultivars  is  reflected  by  a  poor  level  of  polymorphisms  for proteins, isoenzymes, and most types of DNA markers (Bredemeijer et al., 1998). Several systems such   as   RFLPs,   AFLPs,   CAPSs,   SSRs,   have   been   used   in   tomato   to   study   its   level   of polymorphism.  In  order  to  facilitate  the  conservation  and  management  of  tomato  germplasm,  we have  studied  the  genetic  variability  of  some  traditional  tomato  cultivars  from  Spain,  using  both simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and sequence related amplified polymorphisms (SRAPs) markers (Ruiz et al., in press). Both types of markers resolved the cultivars from different groups, but failed to distinguish some of those classified under the same group. It seems that these markers systems are unable to completely differentiate closely related cultivars.  One of the most common forms of genomic variation is single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNP. Its utility in genetic variability studies has already been demonstrated (Rafalski, 2002). In crops such as maize, wheat, soybean or melon (Bhattramakki  et  al.,  2002;  Cregan  et  al.,  2002;  Morales  et  al.,  2004),  collections  of  SNPs  have already been identified. However, there are scarce studies published about SNPs in tomato. Yang et al. (2003) detected 43 SNPs by electronic searching using collections of EST sequences of the cultivars  ‘Rio  Grande’  and  ‘TA496’,  and  they  have  confirmed  these  SNPs  in  other    L.  esculentum cultivars.  Also,  Baldo  et  al.  (2004)  recently  reported  the  electronic  discovery  of  2,527  potential SNPs, and they are in the process of verifying these polymorphisms in the laboratory. We  have  used  20  SNPs  in  order  to  try  to  find  differences  between  47  accessions  of Lycopersicon (Table 1 and 2). Most accessions are different cultivars of the main traditional types of tomato  cultivated  in  southeastern  Spain.  Most  SNPs  have  been  selected  from  those  already identified by Yang et al. (2003). Table 1. Cultivars and accessions studied.   Local Spanish cultivars Cultivar type Cultivars De la pera Per1,  Per7,  Per16,  Per19,  Per21,  Per22,  Per25,  Per43, Per44 Muchamiel Much4,  Much11,  Much18,  Much29,  Much30,  Much128, Much198, BN4, BN5   Morunos Mor207, Mor208, Mor209, Mor231, Mor234 Other types Valenciano,  Teticabra,  Flor  de  Baladre,  CA13,  CA16, CA17, Raf Commercial cultivars Hybrids F1 Bond, Anastasia, Odisea, Royesta, Tirade, Evita, Vision Other cultivars Malpica,    Roma,    Ch89    (Cherry),        Sali,    Zapotec, Moneymaker, EPSO42 Wild species L.    pimpinellifolium    LA2853    and    LA1610;    L.e.    var cerasiforme LA2617 SNPs  were  analyzed  as  cleaved  amplified  polymorphic  sequence  markers.  The  fragments amplified were digested with restriction enzymes, obtaining different band patterns for each one of the accessions. In some cases the fragment amplified by the same couple of primers had more than

No navigation control above? Click here!