Literature cited: Jorda, C. 1996. Informe tomate. Incidencia de las virosis. Hortoinformacion 74: 41-42. Laterrot, H. 1993. Present state of the genetic control of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus and of the ECC-supported bredding programme. In: L. Stamova (editor)., Proceedings of the XIIth Eucarpia Meeting on Tomato Genetics and Breeding. Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 27-31 July 1993, pp. 19-24. Pico, B., Diez, M.J. and Nuez, F. 1996. Viral diseases causing the greatest economic losses to the tomato crop ll. The Tomato yellow leaf curl virus - a review. Scientia Hortic. 67: 151-196. Pilowsky, M. and Cohen, S. 1995. Breeding tomatoes tolerant to the whitefly borne Tomato yellow leaf curl virus. 1st I ntemational Symposium on Solanacea for fresh market. Malaga, Spain, 28-31 March 1995, ISHS, P.138. * Percentage of plants TYLCV infected 3 months after transplanting. 10 plants were assayed per cultivar. Numbers in brackets indicate plants death because of TSWV infection. In this case, the % is referred to the plants alive at the end of the assay. **Evaluation of foliar symptoms on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0= no symptoms, 1= slight symptoms, 2= moderate symptoms, 3= severe symptoms, and 4= very severe symptoms, including severe stunting. ***Evaluation of the effect on the flowering and fruit set on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0= no effect, 1= slight flower shedding, 2= slight flower abortion and shedding. Fruit-set lightly reduced, 3= moderate flower abortion and shedding. Fruit-set moderately reduced, and 4= severe flower abortion and shedding. Fruit-set severely reduced.  

No navigation control above? Click here!