and 4=newly developed leaves showing mosaic symptoms. The resistant material included the Tm-2a lines #96 (=Davis 70T82-1), #167 (Ohio R.M. 9), #151 (Momor 92, Montfavet, France) and the Tm-2 line  #150  (Moperou  111,  Montfavet).  The  susceptible  material  included  #33  (Hotset),  #2  (Hawaii), #20 (Ejlon, Israel) and three local breeding lines, WM, #15 and #47. Reciprocal effect. Line #96 served as the resistant, #2 and #15 as susceptible parents. F1 plants with  the  susceptible  parents  as  female  were  found  to  be  far  more  resistant  to  the  heat  treatment than the reciprocal combinations. Thus, the percentage of healthy plants was 33% (+/Tm-2a) and 17% (Tm-2a /+) in one experiment, 72% and 46%, respectively, in the second, and 61% and 25% in the third experiment. Parental  genotypes.  Six  F1  crosses  between  a  resistant  Tm-2a  female  and  6  susceptible  male parents showed little variation in resistance to the heat treatment. Similar results were obtained in two experiments with other Tm-2a lines as female parent. However, in one experiment, comparing three Tm-2a lines with a common susceptible male parent, the D.I. was significantly higher in the F1 96 x 20 (D.I. 3.67) than in F1 151 x 20 (1.83) or in F1 167 x 20 (1.54). Heat-necrosis  in  Tm-2/+.  After  48  h  of  heat  treatment  at  35C  no  disease  symptoms  were observed in plants of 4 different Tm-2/+ hybrids with #150 as . Even a prolonged heat treatment of 72 h gave a very low D.I., with 5% to 15% of the plants showing some disease symptoms. Duration of heat treatment and cumulative effect. Plants of 5 different hybrids (Tm-2a/+) with #96 as female parent were inoculated and kept at 32C for different time intervals before transfer to 20C. With heat treatment for 24 or 48 h periods, 30% to 50% of the plants showed systemic necrosis, while all 10 h treated plants remained healthy. Similar results were obtained with #167 as female parent. In  the  following  experiment  heat  effects  were  not  found  to  be  cumulative  even  after  24 daily  heat  periods  of  7  h.  Inoculated  plants  were  grown  with  a  12  h  photoperiod  for  24  days under a thermoperiod of 33 (7 h) and 20o (17 h). All of the 5 Tm-2a/+ hybrid combinations with #151 as the  resistant  female  parent  remained  healthy,  while  controls  receiving  only  a  single  24  h  heat treatment showed a high incidence of disease. Heat  treatment  before  inoculation.  In  all  the  above  experiments,  plants  were  heattreated after inoculation. In order to test the reverse situation, FL plants 151 x 33 (Tm-2a/+) of different ages were  kept  for  48  h  at  35°  C  before  inoculation  and  immediately  transferred  to  25°  C.  The percentage of plants showing systemic necrosis was 25%, 0% and 0% with plants of the  1st,  2nd and 4th true leaf stage, respectively. Controls inoculated before the heat treatment reached a disease  incidence  of  75%.  Thus,  high  temperature  periods  before  inoculation  caused  systemic necrosis in very young seedlings only. noted  the  reaction  of  these  lines  to  Fusarium  oxysporum  f.  sp.  lycopersici  pathotype  2  (artificial infection at the seedling stage) and to Corynebacterium (artificial field infection on adult flowering plants in Avignon). Our observations on relative resistance are reported in the Table. Thus 10 lines bred  for  P.  solanacearum  resistance  which  were  confirmed  for  this  character  in  Guadeloupe manifest a partial resistance to Fusarium pathotype 2. We mentioned this  result  for  some  of  these lines in  TGC 25 and in "Annales d'Amelioration des Plantes" 1977:27(1)25-34. We verified that all these lines are resistant to Fusarium pathotype 1 (gene I) and do not seem to have I-2 (a pathotype 2 resistance gene). 9 of these 10 lines manifest a partial resistance to C. michiganense. The resistance of Saturn and 72 TR 4.4. was mentioned by W. Henderson and S. Jenkins (North Carolina State University). In  the  last  ten  years,  various  tomato  lines resistant  to  Pseudomonas  solanacearum  bred  in tropical and subtropical stations were evaluated in    Guadeloupe    on    soils    infested    by    this pathogen. At the same time we have   Laterrot,   H.,   and   F.   Kaan   Resistance   to Corynebacterium michiganense of lines bred for resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum.

No navigation control above? Click here!